Amelia Rajecki vs Yuriko Miyazaki Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 07 Aug at 04:01 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Rajecki vs Y. Miyazaki

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Rajecki 1 - 0 Miyazaki
They have played 2 sets in total, with Amelia Rajecki winning 2 and Yuriko Miyazaki winning 0. The last match between Amelia Rajecki and Yuriko Miyazaki was at the W35 Roehampton, 07-08-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Amelia Rajecki getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Rajecki | 1 |
Miyazaki | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W35 Roehampton(08-07-25)
A. Rajecki vs Y. Miyazaki H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$4,965 | Career Prize Money | $305,357 |
52.71% (68-61) | Career Total W/L | 59.03% (291-202) |
1 | Hard | 0 |
1 | Titles | 7 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. Rajecki vs Y. Miyazaki Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Recently, Rajecki has secured 40.82% of points on their second serve, compared to Miyazaki's 37.21%. Does this give Rajecki an advantage? It may indicate a slight edge.
- Return Game: Miyazaki leads in returning the first serve, winning 32.9% against Rajecki's 27.15%. However, their percentages in returning the second serve are very close, with Miyazaki at 49.16% and Rajecki at 48.89%.
- Under Pressure: While both players are quite adept at saving breakpoints, Rajecki edges ahead slightly, saving 49.02% to Miyazaki's 48.82%. Can this impact the outcome? It could play a crucial role in tight moments.
- Overall Performance: In the past year, Rajecki has won 57.58% of their matches, while Miyazaki has won 56.9%. Who holds the advantage overall? Rajecki by a narrow margin.
- Best Surface: Miyazaki excels on indoor hard courts with a 65% win rate, whereas Rajecki thrives on hard courts with a 58% win rate.
- Level of Competition: Miyazaki has competed against higher-ranked opponents, averaging a rank of 296.22 versus Rajecki's 350.08.
- Deciding Set Performance: Miyazaki boasts a 63% success rate in deciding sets compared to Rajecki's 47%. If the match reaches a decider, Miyazaki could have an edge.
- Breakpoint Conversion: Miyazaki is more effective at turning breakpoint opportunities, with a 39.7% conversion rate, relative to Rajecki's 34.62%.
Editorial Prediction (August 7, 2025, UTC):
In this upcoming match, both players show closely matched statistics in several key areas, suggesting a competitive showdown. Rajecki appears to have a slight advantage in second serve performance, suggesting potential reliability in maintaining service games.
Conversely, Miyazaki demonstrates stronger first serve return metrics and greater efficiency in converting breakpoints, which can be critical in tight sets. Her superior performance under deciding set conditions is also noteworthy.
Considering Miyazaki's tendency to perform better against higher-ranked opponents and her proficiency in critical match moments, she might hold a slight edge overall. Consequently, Miyazaki is more likely to emerge victorious in this closely contested match.
Amelia Rajecki vs Yuriko Miyazaki Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Rajecki vs Y. Miyazaki H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
13 | Games Won | 8 |
4 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
6 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
1:47:55 | Average Match Time | 1:47:55 |
69% (52/75) | 1st Serve % | 55% (40/73) |
77% (40/52) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (28/40) |
43% (10/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (13/33) |
25% (3/12) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (1/4) |
44% (32/73) | Return Points Win % | 33% (25/75) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Rajecki Recent Matches Played
Y. Miyazaki Recent Matches Played

A. Rajecki vs Y. Miyazaki Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
52.71% (68/61) | YTD Win/Loss | 59.03% (291/202) |
53.08% (155/137) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.73% (649/495) |
51.82% (1396/1298) | Games Win/Loss | 52.77% (5538/4956) |
54.93% (39/32) | Hard Win/Loss | 61.48% (158/99) |
0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 42.31% (22/30) |
56.41% (22/17) | Indoor Hard W/L | 64.54% (91/50) |
36.84% (7/12) | Grass Win/Loss | 46.51% (20/23) |
0.44 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
580 | Aces Total | 693 |
0.5 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
649 | Total Double Faults | 1687 |
1:28:26 | Average Match Time | 1:17:38 |
407.14 | Average Opponent Rank | 447.9 |
57% (4745/8309) | 1st Serve % | 62% (16891/27074) |
70% (3303/4745) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (10642/16891) |
44% (1578/3564) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (4506/10183) |
47% (375/805) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1743/3604) |
42% (3267/7854) | Return Points Win % | 47% (13057/28064) |
0.00% (0/2) | Slam W/L | 44.00% (11/14) |
0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
42.86% (3/4) | Main Tour W/L | 47.37% (9/10) |
50.49% (52/51) | Challenger W/L | 58.66% (193/136) |
76.47% (13/4) | Futures W/L | 66.10% (78/40) |
52% (66/127) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (283/483) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
59% (17/29) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (43/87) |
42% (15/36) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (90/162) |
89% (65/58) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (268/229) |
11% (65/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (268/38) |
16% (64/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (225/60) |